PCB Assembly Graphic

Which Factors Determine Molded Part Accuracy?

Mold fabrication machine


You may have wondered which factors determine molded part accuracy and therefore the tolerances of the injection molded parts from both prototype and production molders. It’s a complex question that I will try to explain. Some factors that are within the molder’s control and some are not. The following factors determine molded part accuracy during mold fabrication and molding:

Material Used For Injection Molded Parts

Material selection and shrinkage rate

Material selection and shrinkage rate is responsible for the largest contribution towards molded part accuracy. For example, polypropylene has a shrinkage range of 0.010 – 0.020 in/in, a relatively large range. The actual shrinkage rate within that range is determined by the part geometry. The challenge for mold designers is to know which shrinkage rate to apply to achieve molded parts with features that are not offset larger or smaller than nominal. Let’s assume the mold designer used a shrinkage rate of 0.013 in/in but the actual shrinkage is larger at 0.017 in/in. Let’s also assume an inspected feature on the molded part is 2” in length then the feature will be molded 0.008” larger than nominal. If the part feature needs to be within a tolerance of 0.005” then this feature will not be within tolerance and every part molded will need to be rejected. Ideally the mold designer has experience over several hundred molds with a wide variety of materials and part geometries to draw on when estimating the shrinkage to apply when designing the mold.

Molding machine

Molding machine is a factor that provides the molder some flexibility. The accuracy and repeatability of each shot as well as precise temperature control requires selection and investment in a high quality molding machine. Not all molding machines are created equally. In addition, the shot volume and clamping force of the molding machine must be selected based on the needs of the mold to be run. As a rule of thumb, the shot volume of the machine should be between 20-80% of the barrel capacity. Lower than 20% tends to create plastic residency issues with the material spending too much time in the barrel which can negatively alter material properties. Too large of a shot volume can create issues with consistency of the melted plastic. Assuming that a high quality machine of the correct size is selected, a skilled molder can adjust the molding process to provide flexibility to adjust geometry on the order of about 0.001” as needed.

Molding environment

Molding environment such as the temperature and humidity around the molding machine during molding. If the environment is not controlled part geometry can vary by up to 0.003” using the same molding process compared to a day running with ambient temperate of 75 deg F and low humidity. Therefore, it’s critical to select a molder that has a controlled environment around their molding machines. There are many molders that do not have a controlled

Mold fabrication equipment

Mold fabrication equipment including the milling machine, lathe, EDM (electrode discharge machining), grinding, etc. It’s important to select a molder that is using fabrication equipment with sufficient accuracy for mold fabrication. Equipment with a tolerance of 0.0001” or better is recommended. The contribution from this source is typically negligible with the selection of proper equipment.

Cutting tool

Cutting tool accuracy such as ball or end mills also typically have a negligible contribution towards molded part accuracy if the cutting tool is properly measured before machining. If properly measured, the actual tool diameter can be incorporated into the toolpaths used to fabricate the mold. This limits mold fabrication inaccuracies due to the cutter to within a tolerance of 0.0001”. While this can be difficult to confirm, select a molder that has inspection equipment in their machine shop as this is an indication that the machinists are measuring cutting tools rather than assuming the diameter when creating toolpaths.

Discussion and Conclusions

Since material selection and shrinkage are the most significant factor towards determining molded part accuracy and tolerance, they deserve further discussion. The details of material selection are the subject of a separate article since there are many factors that need to be considered. Injection molded plastics fall within two categories: amorphous and semi-crystalline. Amorphous materials include polycarbonate, ABS, HIPS, etc.

Semi-crystalline materials include polypropylene, polyethylene, etc. One of the key differences between amorphous and semi-crystalline materials is the shrinkage rate. Semi-crystalline materials typically have shrinkage rates that are 2-3 times greater than amorphous materials. We have already examined how semi-crystalline materials such as polypropylene have a relatively large range of shrinkage and how it doesn’t take a large difference between the estimated and actual shrinkage to create an inaccuracy that creates a bias in the part being either too large or too small compared to nominal that can easily exceed the tolerance. Therefore, the most part accuracy occurs by selecting an amorphous material which allows for tighter tolerances to be defined.

The estimation of shrinkage rate for the mold design can be further complicated if the material to be used contains an additive. Many times, the additive will alter the shrinkage, sometimes significantly such that it can be difficult to estimate accurately. In that case, the approach would be to run the material in an existing mold that has similar size and geometry. Measurements of the molded parts can then be used to determine the shrink rate of the material in that mold. Although the shrink rate would not be an exact estimation of material shrink rate, it is close enough for use in designing a new mold.

As we’ve discussed there are several factors which determine molded part accuracy. However, material selection along with the estimation of the shrinkage rate during mold design are by far the most significant and require the most attention. 

Based on 7 reviews
Dana Taylor
Dana Taylor
If you're in need of a molding prototype shop, Dylann and Jimmy at Protoshop are sure to not only meet but exceed your expectations. Their team demonstrates remarkable responsiveness and proactiveness, contributing to an exceptionally efficient overall process. The speed at which they deliver top-notch work is truly impressive. Protoshop's commitment to customer satisfaction is apparent in their flexibility and willingness to closely collaborate with clients to address specific needs. An exemplary instance of this was their accommodation of our request to have our customer onsite for part evaluation and mold changes while we were present. What sets Protoshop apart is not solely their technical proficiency but also their dedication to providing valuable insights and design advice. Their expertise extends beyond standard projects, showcasing proficiency in handling complex components for diverse applications, be it over-molded sealing parts or flexible components. In conclusion, if you're on the lookout for a reliable and efficient partner for your manufacturing and molding requirements, I wholeheartedly recommend Protoshop. Their combination of expertise, responsiveness, and commitment to customer satisfaction makes them an exceptional choice for a variety of projects.
Brittany Mason
Brittany Mason
I have worked with Photoshop on several mold designs over the past year. From the moment I reached out to them with an inquiry, they were prompt in their communication and eager to assist me. I have greatly appreciated and benefited from their extensive expertise and prompt feedback. They consistently offering valuable suggestions and insights that ultimately saved us money in the overall design. As for the quality of work they provided, Dylann and her team have always come through. If any issues do arise, they have been quick to offer solutions and kept us up to date throughout the whole process. If you're looking for a reliable partner for your plastics molding needs, I would check them out.
Stacie Depner
Stacie Depner
Having worked with Dylann and Jimmy prior to Protoshop, I knew the immense level of expertise they have for this business and it proved to carry through. They are honest straight shooters that will help guide you and find the best solution for your molds. We needed a mild that could be versatile and allow us to easily change out one side of the design. Dylann helped us come up with an approach that will allow us to continuously iteration the design without having to make a whole new mold every time.
Chad Follmar
Chad Follmar
Dylann and team are wonderful to work with. On multiple programs, they have delivered quality product in a matter of days. The design for moldability support is unparalled to ensure your part is ready to order.
Garrett Garner
Garrett Garner
We work regularly with Protoshop on a variety of complex components for various projects. They are an excellent company to work with providing a vast history of experience to help their clients optimize designs. We have worked with them on microfluidic chips with small feature sizes, over molded sealing parts and flexible parts. They have experience working with many materials including Topas (COC), polycarbonate, TPE, PE, and PP. I would highly recommend reaching out on your next project. The team is very responsive to design changes as well as delivering to tight timelines. They also offer design advice and best practices which have helped expedite design iterations.
Steven Soeder
Steven Soeder
Great experience with Protoshop. Dylann is extremely responsive and great to work with. Very fast turn-around. Worked with us on our order to get what we needed. I was able to drop ship 3d printed parts from another vendor to Protoshop to have them match-fit and incorporated into our tooling. I will be back again.
Wendell Woidyla
Wendell Woidyla
Dylann at Protoshop is excellent to work with: highly responsive and proactive. This is possibly the fastest, high-quality work I have ever witnessed. 1 week...from payment (start) to delivery (after CTQ measurements at Protoshop), we had 100 test samples of a component we intend to use in high volume manufacturing. Thank you for the tremendous work! I would highly recommend Protoshop, and will plan to use Protoshop services in the future.